Thanks for feedback. Yeah I think we have been limited to date because all the examples we're been using have come from our own work and we've not had time to compare notes on each others' successes where we were using a CTP-like approach.I think it makes sense to narrate CTPs as the formalisation of whats going on on the communtiy level anyway between "techy people" and everyone else -- but right now its unformalised, theres no professional network for it, vocab, methodology, potential to share results, etc.I think we can be quite honest about this with the lottery but that they still will want to see some results in terms of impact - if anyone has a project to share thats been developed along CTP-y lines please do send it over. I think the key thing that makes it CTP-y to me is that any tech work done on a thing was done as a participant member of a collective, not as a client/studio relationship. It's about high recpiprocity due to actually being part of the group that commissions the thing, you have skin in the game.Maybe we should even run an evaluation within this little group - it might be good for us all to reflect on what we see in the proposal?And yes we crrently have 50k down for tech partners and 10k down for community partners altho that assumes they dont ask us to reduce the budget which they prob will.KimOn Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 12:25, Jan Baykara <jan@commonknowledge.coop> wrote:Hey Kim, hope you had a nice time off. Good signal that they're interested.For evidence of community tech partnerships actually working, it's not all "place based communities" in the cosy traditional sense of a parish or something, but maybe we can point to existing projects with communities like:
Joe's/TP's work providing tech to his network — the tech hub and all its offerings, maybe some stats? GFSC's Manchester/other locations case study of PlaceCal for communities CK's work building Mapped for a community of campaigns ... and more like this?All of which combines to make the argument that umbrella + infrastructure orgs with a digital staff are essentially community tech partnerships. That might be a stretch or it might not be, I'm not sure, but if it feels right then we could reach out to other umbrella orgs for different causes and ask them for case studies and metrics too.Jan—Jan Baykara (he / him)Research & Software Engineering at Common KnowledgeMy working hours are 9-5pm Monday to ThursdayOn October 14, 2024 at 12:15 PM, Joe Irving (joe@tippingpointuk.org) wrote:Hi Kim,This is great they are showing interest.I am just back from 3 months off, so getting my head around the application again. Great work on it. For the third question, about listed partners getting funding where did we land on that? From my understanding of the original idea is that partners would get split amounts of the funds to continue their network contribution to the overall project, did I get the right idea?And for the impact one, I could pull out stats from our campaigning tools like Action Network that could be potentially useful for broad impact above case studies?Solidarity,Joe
--Joe Irving (he/they)
Tech @ Tipping Point UKBringing powerful digital tools to grassroots groups, in the fight for climate justice. I work 3.5 days a week, so may not always be able to get back promptly. Feel free to book a meeting with me.Support Tipping Point UKWe organise with grassroots groups in the UK for climate, migrant and social justice. Can you help fund this work? Please give £5 per month, or whatever you can afford, to help us build the movement.On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 12:04, Kim Foale <kim@gfsc.studio> wrote:just got back off my hols and great news - its not a no, but we prob have a little way to go towards yes!the last one - impact - is what we have struggled with from day one - all ears if anyone has any ideas or success stories for their thing locally.will update you all when theres more to update.kim---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Nadine Salter <nadine.salter@tnlcommunityfund.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Sept 2024 at 14:28
Subject: The UK Fund - request for further information
To: kim@gfsc.studio <kim@gfsc.studio>Hello Kim,
I hope you are well. I am one of the Portfolio Officers working on the UK Fund and working on assessing your application. There a few areas from your application that we would like some clarification/further information on:
- what are the gardens of sanctuary and what locations do you plan to expand these to in this project?
- the application states 'we will create a national network' and mentions a 'network of networks'. Is this in place already and you plan to grow within the project, or is this new?
- will the listed partners be receiving funding through this project?
- aside from the case studies, do you have any further evidence that the approach you have taken in the past has worked? This can include project evaluations or anything else to demonstrate the impact of the work.
If easier I am happy to chat these through briefly next week, or you can answer by email - whichever is easier for you.
Kind regards,
Nadine
Nadine Salter
Swyddog Portffolio – Portffolio’r DU | Portfolio Officer – UK PortfolioUn Canal Parade, Heol Dumballs, Caerdydd CF10 5FE
One Canal Parade, Dumballs Road, Cardiff CF10 5FE
Llinell Gymorth | Advice line: 0345 410 2030
Cyfnewid Testun | Text Relay: 18001 0345 410 2030tnlcommunityfund.org.uk | Twitter | Facebook
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ: This e-mail and its contents are confidential, and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed, and protected by law . The contents of this message will not be in any way binding upon The Big Lottery Fund, now operating as The National Lottery Community Fund. Opinions, conclusions, contractual obligations and other information in this message, in so far as they relate to the official business of the Big Lottery Fund, must be specifically confirmed in writing by The National Lottery Community Fund. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Additionally, the information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. We take our responsibility to protect your data seriously. You can find our privacy policy by visiting our website : https://www.tnlcommunityfund.org.uk/about/customer-service/data-protection.
--Working hours: Mon-Wed 10-5pm.- Project: The Trans Dimension, a new space for trans community enabled by technology and collaboration.If anything about this email is confusing or unclear please let me know. I am happy to provide information in different ways such as clearer language, over a phone call, with a voice note, or in plain text. Please don't feel the need to ever apologise for responding to my emails at your own pace.Those who do not move, do not notice their chains._______________________________________________
CTP Tech Partners mailing list -- tech-partners@lists.gfsc.studio
To unsubscribe send an email to tech-partners-leave@lists.gfsc.studio_______________________________________________
CTP Tech Partners mailing list -- tech-partners@lists.gfsc.studio
To unsubscribe send an email to tech-partners-leave@lists.gfsc.studio
--Dr Kim Foale (they/she)Working hours: Mon-Wed 10-5pm.- Project: The Trans Dimension, a new space for trans community enabled by technology and collaboration.If anything about this email is confusing or unclear please let me know. I am happy to provide information in different ways such as clearer language, over a phone call, with a voice note, or in plain text. Please don't feel the need to ever apologise for responding to my emails at your own pace.Those who do not move, do not notice their chains.